Dave Mazzarella

Readers' Corner

Ombudsman Dave Mazzarella answers reader questions about Stars and Stripes.

Column: How tough was Gates on Air Force’s performance?

Some headlines and sound bites that made the worldwide rounds on Monday must have stopped Air Force people in their tracks. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was quoted as denouncing the Air Force for not doing enough to help the war effort. That’s the way I heard it on a national CBS Radio broadcast here in Washington. I don’t know how it sounded on other broadcasts and telecasts, but the written headline on the CBS Web site was this: “Gates: Air Force Lagging in War Effort.” The CNBC Web site’s item read: “Pentagon chief rips Air Force over war.” The CNN Web site headline was, “Defense secretary scolds Air Force over war effort.”

Those must have seemed to be pretty discouraging words to Air Force personnel everywhere, especially the thousands deployed downrange.

The comments stemmed from the first paragraph of an Associated Press report of a speech Gates had just given to student officers at Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base in Alabama: “Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Monday the Air Force is not doing enough to help in the Iraq and Afghanistan war effort, complaining that some military leaders are ‘stuck in old ways of doing business.’”

Gates did indeed complain about the bureaucracy, as the second part of that sentence indicates. But the first half, which has him criticizing the Air Force for not helping enough in the war, is a case of overreaching. Gates did not use those words. They were an extrapolation from what Gates did say about the difficulty he was having getting resources to the war zone. Those statements of his were strong enough, but they stopped well short of giving rise to the inference, as the AP characterization of them seems to do, that the Air Force was somehow shirking its duty as others were fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s not an uncommon occurrence — and one that I was guilty of on occasion as a reporter — when the media try to give broader meaning to, or simplify, nuanced statements by newsmakers.

In truth, Gates’ speech to the young officers was unusually blunt. He criticized officers in the Pentagon for dragging their heels. “I’ve been wrestling for months to get more intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets into the theater,” he said. “Because people were stuck in old ways of doing business, it’s been like pulling teeth. While we’ve doubled this capability (unmanned aerial vehicle deployment) in recent months, it is still not good enough.” He went on to say he was appointing a task force to get more resources to the warfighters quickly.

Although Gates was alluding primarily to the Air Force in this passage — he even noted with obvious disapproval earlier in the speech that the Air Force wouldn’t co-fund a UAV program with the CIA in the early 1990s — the indictment seemed to cast a wider net. The other services also deploy UAVs, and intelligence and surveillance involves all services.

“The Air Force is not immune from criticism, but it certainly isn’t alone in criticism,” Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell was quoted as saying by the Los Angeles Times. That paper had a generally straightforward account of Gates’ speech, incidentally, as did The Washington Post, The New York Times and Stars and Stripes (which perhaps should have tied Gates’ remarks to the Air Force a little more).

In any event, Gates had another key message and to their credit all the news outlets I saw took heed of it. In the Air Force base speech and another later in the day to West Point cadets, Gates exhorted young officer recruits to forcefully challenge ingrained ways of doing things in the military. “[I]f as an officer — listen to me very carefully — if as an officer you don’t tell blunt truths or create an environment where candor is encouraged then you’ve done yourself and the institution a disservice,” he told the cadets.

It’s advice Gates himself seemed to be following that day, even if some media reports had him doing it a little more strongly than he may have intended.

Secretary Gates' Unforgettable Words

While I had almost forgotten the big headlines on Gates' earlier speech on the Air Force, I will not easily forget his words to West Point cadets the next day. As you quote, “[I]f as an officer — listen to me very carefully — if as an officer you don’t tell blunt truths or create an environment where candor is encouraged then you’ve done yourself and the institution a disservice."

What a a terrible shame that his predecessor did not have the fortitude to exhort his generals to do exactly that--and mean it. How much better would the "institution" and our country be now.

Maj. Dorian de Wind (Ret.)

The Major Is Spot On As Usual

You are spot on as usual Maj de Wind.

What a shame that you are retired and not in an active duty position to influence our military in a way it needs to be today. As enlisted, my circle of influence is limited to those few I lead, and occasionaly those I teach during PME (and I do encourage bluntness and exploring thoughtful dissent). But today's officers rarely listen and weigh SNCOs oppinions in their decision making. And it is almost always at their own peril they ignore these voices of years of expereince, hard-earned wisdom, and hands-on tactical engagement that furthers mission accomplishment (or just as important, even that fails to further MA). Two things drive today's officers: ego and powerpoint. They fail to recognize and take advantage of enlisted talent. They expect silent subserviance; or rather they hand out the crayons.

Gates' Advice Applies to Dealing with Subordinates, too

JetTx:

[I hope Dave Mazarella will permit this short "exchange" on his blog, as I have no other way of contacting you.]

First, and without turning this forum into a mutual admiration society, thank you for your kind comments. I read your frequent posts and I find them to be generally on target, too.

Having served in enlisted status prior to being commissioned, I have had similar frustrations as those you cite. I am glad, and proud, to say, however, that--at least in my days--those officers who "rarely listen and weigh SNCOs opinions in their decision making" were few and far between.

That's not to say that things may not have changed drastically since I retired (about 30 years ago). If so, I hope that Gates' words, "[I]f as an officer you don’t tell blunt truths or create an environment where candor is encouraged then you’ve done yourself and the institution a disservice," will also be interpreted by our new (and present) officers as exhorting them to also listen to blunt truths from subordinates and create an environment where candor is encouraged.

As you so correctly say, our Senior NCO corps has a vast pool of "experience, hard-earned wisdom, and hands-on tactical engagement that furthers mission accomplishment." Amen to that, and thanks for your service.

Maj. Dorian de Wind (Ret.)

Speaking Truth to Power

Sec. Gates could have gone further to show how much he believes it's an officer's duty to be honest, even when at risk to his career. He could have performed a simple act that no senior member of his department or the Administration has had the integrity to do so far -- offer a public apology to General Eric Shinseki.

The shameful treatment of Gen. Shinseki was also meant as a message to cower all others to fall in line, or else.

Until Sec. Gates comes forward to admit this and publicly apologize to this man of honor, his words ring hollow.