Dave Mazzarella

Readers' Corner

Ombudsman Dave Mazzarella answers reader questions about Stars and Stripes.

Ethnic angst

The fact that Cho Seung-hui, the killer in the Virginia Tech massacre, was of South Korean extraction has caused heartache and confusion for some.

In Seoul, local citizens held a prayer vigil at the U.S. Embassy, shocked, they said, that Cho was a South Korean native. In southern California, home to the largest South Korean ethnic community in the U.S., there were expressions of shame and fear that there would be some retaliation against South Koreans in America.

In a controversial move, the Asian-American Journalists Association urged "all media to avoid using racial identifiers unless there is a compelling or germane reason."

Most would agree that the populace doesn't blame South Koreans at large for what Cho did. Yet the media must tell all it knows of the subject about whom it reports. Cho's looks and name cried out for his identification as a South Korean. (He was a permanent resident in America.)

Stars and Stripes, like all other media, did so, though in the process left a mistaken impression. The Page One subsidiary headline two days after the shooting called Cho "a student from South Korea." Though the headline was literally correct, readers might have thought Cho's home was in South Korea and he was an exchange student. In fact, Cho's family emigrated to the U.S. 15 years ago when he was eight years old.

Unlike other American newspapers, Stars and Stripes distributes several thousand newspapers to the military in South Korea daily. So Cho's ethnic identity was a locally germane fact. The episode only highlights the difficulties media face in situations where ethnicity plays a role.

Liberal slant in Stars and Stripes

Hello Mr. Mazzarella,

I am writing to ask if the letters department is up to their old tricks once more on the one hand, and on the other, to just to let you know some of your long-time readers see what is happening with the paper.

Regarding letters to the editor, it seems every time I pick up the paper (which admittedly isn't ever day as I work for the Germans) I see more and more of what liberals call "conservative rants." Of course they refer to virtually any argument an educated conservative makes as a "rant." They should look at themselves and their whiny flag bearers. Recently I wrote a letter to the editor, and never saw it although I did check the paper for several days since I only received computer-driven replies from Pary Smith, a person with whom I have had problems dating as far back as 2004. She and her boss apparently have no problem printing liberal rot..makes one wonder.

The selection of editorials and "news" articles run (yes, I was also once a real reporter, and a very good one) on a regular basis these days also causes me wonder if the Stars and Stripes isn't trying to be more like many of the liberal rags Americans are forced to suffer. I hope not. And whatever happened to "State of the Union?" The liberals whined about that incessantly, yet Doonesbury was given a free pass.

Straightforward, and not canned, explanations would be appreciated. I had quite enough experience in Army public affairs as well.

Regards,
Dave Hamilton
Major, U.S. Army (Ret.)